Treasury Bonds: The Darkest Performance in Over 200 Years Reveals a New Paradigm
A compelling analysis published by analyst @biancoresearch (Jim Bianco) on X recently stirred the financial market, revealing an alarming fact about American Treasury Bonds. According to Bianco, the 10-year period ending last summer was the worst for bonds since 1803. This finding, based on charts dating back to 1793, suggests that Treasury Bonds have indeed been the worst investment in recent American history.
Jim Bianco emphasizes that, although past performance is notably poor, this analysis does not predict what the bonds will do next. However, the history raises fundamental questions about the perception of safety and profitability of assets traditionally considered 'risk-free' in a scenario of constant state intervention in financial markets. A crucial read for investors and those skeptical of the hegemony of centralized finance.
The Worst Historical Performance of American Treasury Bonds
Jim Bianco's research is based on historical data compiled by Ed McQuarrie from Santa Clara, which extends the return records of bonds back to 1793. For comparison, Bank of America's analysis of the same asset starts only in 1936. What this long-term perspective reveals is shocking: the last 10 years, up to last summer, represented the worst period for Treasury Bonds since 1803. This is a statement that deserves heightened attention from all market participants.
Therefore, as @gregrieben pointed out, whose post was cited by Bianco, the 10-year rolling returns on Treasuries are now at -2%, which he classified as the worst in 100 years. Bianco, however, deepens this observation, expanding the timeline to over two centuries. This historical context is vital, as it differentiates an unusual downturn from a truly anomalous performance in the trajectory of the U.S. debt market.
The Causes of a Lost Decade for Capital
But why was this decade so bad for Treasury Bonds? Jim Bianco explains that the main attraction of a bond is its yield. Ten years ago, long-term Treasuries were paying 2%. This yield, which should have been a floor, was eroded by the subsequent rise in interest rates, resulting in significant losses in bond prices and, consequently, negative returns. The scenario was further complicated by a series of events that shaped global monetary policy.
To put this in perspective, in 223 years of history, a negative 10-year return occurred in only 25 months. Impressively, 24 of those months are precisely the ones we are currently experiencing. The only other record was in December 1959, with a return of -0.08%. This demonstrates that the recent decade was not a "normal" bad decade, but rather an extraordinary period shaped by Quantitative Easing (QE) and zero interest rates.
Thus, the ultra-liberal monetary policy of the Federal Reserve, combined with the recent and rapid increase in interest rates, decisively contributed to this picture. The Fed's tightening cycle between 2022 and 2023 set a speed record, with 5 percentage points of increases. This rapid maneuver in the cost of money reverberated throughout the economy, heavily penalizing long-term bondholders. As a result, historically low yields were annihilated by the aggressive moves of central banks.
Bianco points out that yields generally anticipate future returns in almost exactly 10 years. Now, he notes, "we have a yield to watch again." This phrase suggests a paradigm shift, where interest rates return to play a more significant role in asset pricing, after years of distortions.
The Relationship Between Yield and Future Returns
There is a strong and proven relationship between the current yield of a bond and its future returns. The higher the yield at the time of purchase, the better the subsequent returns tend to be. This correlation is robust: the R-squared is 0.61 for data dating back to 1800, and rises to 0.85 since 1914. This indicates considerable predictability in the long term.
Ten years ago, an investor bought a bond with a yield of 2%. Today, that same bond offers a yield of 5.2%. Therefore, history suggests that this current yield of 5.2% could translate into approximately 5% per year over the next decade, very different from the -2% recently observed. Some more tactical investors are already signaling that the attractiveness of the asset significantly increases when the yield exceeds market interest rates by 1%, signaling a potential return of interest in these assets.
-- Price
This content is provided for general informational purposes only and doesn't constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Any events, rewards, online promotions, or related information mentioned herein should not be considered a recommendation, solicitation, or invitation to purchase, sell, trade, or otherwise deal in any crypto assets. Crypto assets are highly volatile and may result in loss. The availability of WEEX services, products, and related events may vary by region. You are responsible for ensuring that your participation is in accordance with applicable local laws and regulations.
You may also like

Colombia captures network that laundered USD 42 million with cryptocurrencies

Argentina seizes nearly $400,000 in cryptocurrencies for the first time

Supermarket Claims in Argentina Could Affect Cryptocurrency Use

The session to annul the DNU allowing bitcoin contracts in Argentina failed

Brazilian Police Seize Approximately $1.7 Million in Cryptocurrency in ClickFix Operation

Shorooq and Presight Invest in $100 Million Maven Robotics Round

Industry Day: CABA lost 17,000 jobs in the sector in 2 years and warns that the decline continues

Four Argentine provinces increase their export contribution in the first half of 2026

Why is the U Card / VCC Virtual Card Platform Suspected of Illegal Business Operations?

BisonFi: How an Aggregator Captured Orders with Over $2 Billion in Weekly Trading Volume?

Anthropic IPO Filing Lifts AI Sentiment; BTC Holds Near $80,000 | WEEX TradFi Daily (October 27, 2026)
All three major indexes closed higher on October 26. Anthropic formally filed for a listing, rekindling AI speculation; the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index rose about 3% on the day, and Tesla reached a more-than-three-month high. Bitcoin was near $80,200, down for three consecutive weeks and testing $80,000 for a third time. Local assets plunged after the election result. The October 27 focus is the opening of the Federal Reserve meeting and earnings from Visa, PayPal and others.

Bitcoin Price Ahead of October 28 Fed Decision: What 2026 Data Shows

OCC Calls on Banks to Enter the Stablecoin Payment Space

Oil Pulls Back After Last Week’s Rally. What Does It Mean for Bitcoin and Stocks?

After a 95% Drop in TVL, Sony's L2 Soneium is Finally Launching Its Token

唐华斑竹 Analyzes BTC Price Fluctuations and Market Dynamics

Hong Kong RWA Officially Enters 24/7 Secondary Market Era

Important News from Last Night and This Morning (October 26 - October 27)

Meta Refinancing|Rewire News Morning Report

How Optimism’s draft manual silently strips tokenholder elections

Chinese AI Stocks Plunge, STAR50 Falls 40% in Four Months

3 payment rules control Aave’s native Bitcoin market, but only WBTC settles them

August updates block critical private key leak in crypto wallet Vultisig

Onchain Fees: Crypto Protocols Earn $4 Billion in the Third Quarter

Tom Lee Did It Again. Bitmine Spent $24 Million on Ethereum, but Purchases Are Decreasing

Bitcoin Threatened by a Fragile American Economy and Persistent Inflation

Why Prediction Markets Got the Brazilian Election So Wrong

Crypto Scam from a Wrong Number: $140,000 Vanished in Canada

Key Week for Central Banks: The Fed, ECB, and BoJ Decide on Their Rates







