Hackers Stole $320 Million Worth of BTC but Returned Most of It!
Hackers stole 4,000 Bitcoins from the Liquid Network and demanded that the network fix security vulnerabilities. After the network complied, they returned 85% of the stolen BTC. What vulnerability were they referring to, and what did the conversations between Liquid and the hackers look like?
The hackers responsible for the attack on the Liquid Network and the theft of 4,000 Bitcoins kept their word, albeit not completely. After previously demanding that the network fix all security flaws, they returned the stolen Bitcoins just a few minutes ago. This occurred right after Blockstream confirmed that the vulnerabilities in the bridge nodes had been patched, which was a demand from the individual or individuals behind the attack. However, it turns out that not all Bitcoins returned to their rightful place, as 3,400 Bitcoins were sent back to the wallet, indicating that the hackers decided to keep 600 BTC for themselves. This is no small amount, as it is worth over $47 million at the current exchange rate.
Update: 3,400 BTC of the roughly 4,000 BTC withdrawn on September 6 has been returned to the @Liquid_BTC Federation wallet. The return followed confirmation from @Blockstream that the affected bridge nodes have been patched. Approximately 598 BTC remains outstanding, and... --- Samson Mow (@Excellion) September 7, 2026
They stole BTC worth $320 million. What was the hackers' attack on Liquid Network about?
Over the weekend, hackers stole 4,000 Bitcoins from the official wallet of the Liquid Network, worth approximately $320 million. The target of the attack was a wallet that was supposed to contain around 4,200 BTC, and the funds were siphoned off through the SideSwap bridge. The network immediately halted all transactions and issued a statement assuring that there had been no breach of the Bitcoin blockchain. The operation was said to have been conducted by exploiting a vulnerability in the Liquid infrastructure.
Interestingly, the statement referred to the perpetrators as "white-hat hackers." This term typically describes hackers whose actions have a positive motive. This could suggest that the aim of the attack was not merely to steal Bitcoins, but rather to draw attention to some security flaw. And as it turns out, that was indeed the case.
We are aware of a security incident on @Liquid_BTC. Purported white-hat hackers have withdrawn
4,000 BTC ($320 million) from the Liquid Federation wallet. The @Blockstream team is working on contacting them on-chain with a signed message.What we know so far is that the funds... --- Liquid Network 🌊 (@Liquid_BTC) September 6, 2026
It was about a vulnerability in the commit. We know this from the blockchain conversation.
The attackers left a message on the blockchain stating, "we are whitehats. contact us on chain." The conversation quickly made its way to the network, allowing us to observe how the network negotiated with the hackers and what their demands were. Previous suggestions were confirmed that the aim was to draw attention to a security flaw. The attackers wrote that the current commit chain is at risk and demanded that Liquid Network ensure that all vulnerabilities are patched. They assured that as soon as they were confident that the threat had been eliminated, they would return the stolen funds. As we mentioned, they kept their word, but it remains unclear whether they will return the remaining 600 Bitcoins. It is worth noting that observing the conversation through the blockchain is at least interesting. You can see the record of the conversation below:
The discussion between @Blockstream and the white-hat hacker (WHH) regarding the ~4000 BTC from @Liquid_BTC is happening in public. It seems to be their preference over email. As it's hard to follow the chain of messages in OP_RETURN, here's a summary with links.
11:30 AM PDT -... https://t.co/IEXyFpBITx --- Samson Mow (@Excellion) September 7, 2026
Read also:
- Bitcoin falls below $80,000. Will crypto return to declines due to this data?
- New arrest in the Zondacrypto case. It concerns a collaborator of Sylwester Suszek
- Institutions are withdrawing from Bitcoin ETF funds. BTC price under pressure
-- Price
This content is provided for general informational purposes only and doesn't constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Any events, rewards, online promotions, or related information mentioned herein should not be considered a recommendation, solicitation, or invitation to purchase, sell, trade, or otherwise deal in any crypto assets. Crypto assets are highly volatile and may result in loss. The availability of WEEX services, products, and related events may vary by region. You are responsible for ensuring that your participation is in accordance with applicable local laws and regulations.
You may also like

"Electric Vehicle Chargers as Web3 Physical Assets" ··· Park Se-jin, CEO of Gorae Protocol, "One Charger Will Become a Financial Unit"

Strong jobs just triggered a hawkish UBS reversal that could pressure Bitcoin through December

Your LG TV Might Still Be Listening to You—Even When It Looks Like It’s Off

Dollar Loses Global Strength: What a Strong Yen Signals to Investors

Textile Industry in Crisis: Production Fell 24% in the First Half of the Year and Nearly 27,000 Jobs Lost Since 2023

Bitwise Amends Ethereum ETF Filing To Include Staking Mechanics

Accelerating AI Research at OpenAI: Agents Already Work Three Times More Than Humans

Polymarket - Presidential Election 2027: $128M Bet, Blocked in France

The party is over for cryptocurrency scammers who splurged after the million-dollar bitcoin heist

Clarity Law to be voted on September 15, delay until 2030 if not approved

Bitget Wallet Launches Assetback Rewards In Bitcoin And Tokenized Assets

Wintermute Acquires 3.43 Million PONS Worth 2.4 Million Dollars

China Buys Gold at Fastest Pace in 3 Years: What Changes

How Crypto Trading Is Changing With Zero Fees and AI

Operation NABU "Carthage": What Business Thinks About the New Corruption Scandal

Yen Reaches Highest Level Against Dollar Since February, Bitcoin Watches

Global Interest Rates at Record Highs: What This Means for Investors in Brazil

Analyst Sees Potential in Ethereum, Chainlink, Bittensor

Saudi Aramco's Jizan Oil Facility Attacked, International Oil Prices Surge

BNB Chain Launches a Battleground, Is the Keyword This Round 'Coin-Stock Meme'?

Bitcoin: Miners' Revenues Rebound, but Hashrate Lags Behind

Data Center Growth in Australia: Big US Tech Ready to Invest $155 Billion

IFM Launches K2 Horizon, an Open AI Family with Up to 375 Billion Parameters

Arthur Hayes Acquires 2 Million USD in Uniswap (UNI) Over Two Days
![[Editorial] Freedom: More Important Than Democracy](/public-static/29_4631d65680.png?format=avif)
[Editorial] Freedom: More Important Than Democracy

Can AI Preferred Networks chips really beat Nvidia by 10 times?

Are AI Trading Apps Good for Crypto? Inside the WEEX AI Wars Hackathon

Trump's Approval Drops to 33% and Pressures Markets Ahead of Midterms

Is AI Trading Real or Hype? WEEX AI Wars II Explained









